Results 1 to 1 of 1
  1. #1
    dR www.desirulez.net
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Leeds, England
    Posts
    6,640

    Default Former WCW Announcer Weighs In On Goldberg/Ryback Comparisons, Sting's Transformation

    Follow us on Social Media





    Former WCW announcer Scott Hudson appeared on Inside The Ropes this past Thursday, here are the highlights:

    On Stingís character changing into the Crow gimmick in 1996: "I thought it was brilliant. Sting for better or worse, is never going to be confused with Shawn Michaels or Kenta Kobashi or the great workers of the business. Itís not that Sting was a poor worker but he wasnít gonna go out there and give you a 5 star match every time he laced up a pair of boots. But the thing that got him over was his charisma. You go back and look at those Sting promos, they werenít that good either. They were passable promos, some didnít make any sense but he had such a charisma that he got over. And Eric, to his ever lasting credit, got the idea, he said ďWhat can we do to get Sting over? Heís only getting so hot and then when we try to put him on top, the buyrates go down, the ratings go down, we need to do something to elevate him to where he can become the top guyĒ And Ericís idea was, you know everyone likes Sting nobody doesnít like Sting so Eric thought Sting canít really work and isnít that great at promos so how about if we have him not work and not say anything and then heíll be really over. So thatís what they did. If you go back and look at that whole build up to Starrcade 97, it took him months to even say anything or point the black bat at somebody. And he was never more over than at that time when he didnít say anything and he didnít wrestle. That was the most popular heís ever been.

    The comparison between Goldberg and Ryback: "Eric Bischoff was smart enough to know the nWo werenít gonna last forever so he started building up Goldberg who would go on to be the over arching storyline and I guess be the Hulk Hogan of 1985 in WCW in 1998. That was a terrific way to use him, but then by comparison, you look at Ryback right now in the WWE, who is so obviously a knock off of what we did with Goldberg and if heís over at all, and I question whether or not he is, heís nowhere near as over as Goldberg was. And itís because we booked Goldberg correctly. He never lost, that was the whole gimmick and the minute he lost he lost that luster. Well Ryback has been beaten by, who knows, Santino Marella? Lilian Garcia? who knows, heís been beaten by everybody. You know, we let Goldberg be the monster and beat up everybody. They tried to make Ryback a monster and he gets beaten up. Nobody buys that. That gimmick only has a certain shelf life unless you build him as this incredible monster and we built Goldberg perfectly only to screw it up with that finger poke of doom and stuff."

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •