Results 1 to 20 of 32
Thread: Only 4 TNA PPV's a Year!?
01-11-2013, 09:29 PM #1
Only 4 TNA PPV's a Year!?
TNA announced that they will shorten their PPV Schedule. First it was announced they short it down to 6 PPv's, now they announced its going to be only 4 main PPV's.
Less PPV's means more time to build up Storylines and the Company can concentrate more on the Weekly shows. No Company does this at the moment so its very innovative. and there are a lot more good aspects.
What do you think about that?? Do you think its a Good Idea from TNA??
Share your thoughts on thatDo you know Richard Cheese?
01-11-2013, 09:32 PM #2
Less ppv why ?? i would love to see altest 12 ppv
01-11-2013, 09:35 PM #3Do you know Richard Cheese?
01-11-2013, 09:38 PM #4
01-11-2013, 09:43 PM #5
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
PPV every 2 months would be a lot better in my opinion.
But whatever helps them make better storylines is a thumbs up from me.
01-11-2013, 09:52 PM #6
Do you know Richard Cheese?
01-11-2013, 09:57 PM #7
01-11-2013, 10:04 PM #8
Its a bad business decision . Ppv's sell most anyways lets wait and see . In a way Ppv is just a name theres not much difference except that on shows titles are defended on specials and on Ppvs it has to be defended so it wont change anything
It's Clobberin Time
01-11-2013, 10:15 PM #9
01-11-2013, 10:18 PM #10
01-11-2013, 10:20 PM #11
Its Not Good Idea
AchievmentsdR Wrestler Of The Month March 2013 I dR Wrestler Of The Month July 2013 I dR Star Of The Month May 2013 I 2x GFX League Champion
We want punk..........We want punk..........We want punk..........
01-11-2013, 10:38 PM #12
Its a good idea!
WWE is just greedy about money, bookings, ratings and That's why they have 12 ppv in a year and That's what made People wanting 12 PPV's by every Wrestling Co-Operation (like ROH, TNA)What I Have Achieved
"dR Wrestler Of The Year 2012 (voted)"
"dR Wrestler Of The Month May"2013 (chosen)"
"dR Wrestler Of The Month August 2012 (voted)"
01-12-2013, 07:01 AM #13
•°·._.•β€$ţ ɨɲ ţh€ ώ๏яℓď•._.·°•
✪ƒєєℓ ƒяєє тσ яєρ✪
╰☆╮ ╰☆╮ ╰☆╮
01-12-2013, 08:11 AM #14
I think its a really cool idea, harks back to the old days of NWA-WCW. Nobody buys TNA PPVs anyway so its not like their losing money, and the PPV model is so incredibly dated these days anyway that its probably for the best in the long run.The Prince Is Here...
01-12-2013, 06:21 PM #15
01-12-2013, 06:52 PM #16
01-12-2013, 07:27 PM #17
Good idea in my opinon. More time to build up Matches and fueds, and if they're going so long they will end with a big clash at the PPV and then new fueds will start.
01-12-2013, 08:15 PM #18
Yeah I thought about it and it could be really great. think about it. 2 guys feuding 3 month on Impact building up a nice storyline, fighting some matches with back and forth and at the PPV a final battle.
AWESOMEDo you know Richard Cheese?
01-12-2013, 08:35 PM #19
it's a good idea , sometimes i even like impact more than a ppv , so it's all about storylines , i prefer a ppv every 2 months .
Star Of The Month May 2013
Wrestler Of The Month February 2013
01-12-2013, 08:36 PM #20